The former Pfizer Executive, Vice President and Chief Scientific Officer of the A&R Research Unit of Pfizer Dr Mike Yeadon reveals his findings on the false positivity of Covid tests, the inexistent second wave of covid stating that the pandemic is over.
Regarding immunity, there are genuinely good news, but not a surprise. As you can read at the article, those recovered from SARS still have vigorous T-cell responses 17y later, humans are good at becoming immune to this virus. That’s great. That’s why vaccines work yet will be needed by so few as Dr. Mike Yeadon states.
Despite claims by Anthony Fauci and others that Americans should brace for a “second wave” of the Wuhan coronavirus (covid-19), former Pfizer Chief Science Officer Dr. Mike Yeadon says this is nothing but fear-mongering based on junk science and fraud.
Former vice president at the pharmaceutical giant, Dr. Yeadon claims that “almost all” of the tests being conducted for the Wuhan coronavirus (covid-19) are “false positives,” a phenomenon that has already been observed in Florida. Dr. Yeadon also says that “there is no science to suggest a second wave should happen.”
Any “second wave” that comes along is completely manufactured based on fake “new cases,” Dr. Yeadon is further quoted as saying, responding in the affirmative when asked if “we are basing a government policy, an economic policy, a civil liberties policy, in terms of limiting people to six persons in a meeting … all based on what may well be completely fake data.”
“Were it not for the test data that you get from the TV all the time, you would rightly conclude that the pandemic was over, as nothing much has happened,” Dr. Yeadon further stated, noting that more people will probably be admitted to hospitals for influenza in the coming months, but that these should not be mistaken as Wuhan coronavirus (covid-19) admissions.
Dr. Yeadon published a paper suggesting that the “curve” was “flattened” months ago
Earlier this month, Dr. Yeadon and his colleagues published a paper they co-authored about the so-called “pandemic.” Entitled, “How Likely is a Second Wave?” this paper explains that most of the deaths associated with the Wuhan coronavirus (covid-19) occurred back in March and April, and quickly tapered off in the months that followed.
By April, most countries, including the U.S., had successfully “flattened the curve,” though increased testing, most of which is fraudulent, continues to report new “cases” that those in favor of continued pandemic restrictions are using as “evidence” to push for endless mask-wearing, physical distancing and in some cases, lockdowns.
“It has widely been observed that in all heavily infected countries in Europe and several of the U.S. states likewise, that the shape of the daily deaths vs. time curves is similar to ours in the U.K.,” this paper reveals. “Many of these curves are not just similar, but almost super imposable.”
This is further reflected in the latest survival figures, which since the month of May have risen to 99.8 percent of infections – meaning only 0.2 percent of people who test positive for the Wuhan coronavirus (covid-19) end up dying at some point after being “diagnosed.”
This 99.8 percent survival rate is significantly higher than the one proposed by Fauci back in March and April when he falsely claimed that upwards of 6 percent of Wuhan coronavirus (covid-19) patients would die from the virus – meaning Fauci incorrectly claimed that the novel virus was 20 to 30 times more deadly than it actually is.
“The Infection Fatality Rate (IFR) value accepted by Yeadon et al in the paper is .26%,” writes Ralph Lopez for HubPages. “The survival rate of a disease is 100% minus the IFR.”
Concerning the allegedly “novel” nature of the Wuhan coronavirus (covid-19), Dr. Yeadon claims that it is only novel in the sense that it is a new type of coronavirus. As it turns out, there are many other types of coronaviruses in existence, including four other strains that are freely circulating throughout the population as you read this.
“They all have striking sequence similarity to the new coronavirus,” Dr. Yeadon points out in his paper, offering a different perspective that is rarely, if ever, mentioned by the mainstream media.
The former Pfizer Executive Dr Mike Yeadon, has reissued his challenge to the British Health Secretary Matt Hancock regarding the coronavirus testing.
Read Dr Yeadon’s basic statements and watch the relevant videos.
Dr Yeadon said the Government is “using a test with an undeclared false positive rate. That’s dreadful“.
“If you don’t know what it is – shame on you“.
Dr Mike Yeadon wants those who have tested positive for coronavirus to be tested again to eliminate the possibility of the test being a false positive.
The former Chief Scientific Advisor of Pfizer has told talkRADIO he does not believe there is a second wave, and has challenged the Government to prove otherwise. Dr Mike Yeadon said he was going to “challenge the Government to cite the research literature that underscores their belief in a second wave. “There’s no science that says [a second wave] will happen“.
“Imperial/SAGE (Imperial University Advisory Group of Experts) never released the scientific data on which they based their 2nd wave predictions. Total no of deaths modelled are 2x the 1st wave. This is literally impossible, immunologically implausible. I accuse them of MAKING IT ALL UP. Humiliate me. Release the evidence.”
Dr Mike Yeadon has claimed the Covid-19 pandemic is “fundamentally over” in the UK. He have said: “We now know that loads of people had prior immunity, there’s an unbelievable amount of data, Whitty and Vallance (the government’s chief scientific advisers) have ignored it…I believe firmly we are now at community immunity.”
“You do not vaccinate people who arent at risk from a disease.”
“You also don’t set about planning to vaccinate millions of fit and healthy people with a vaccine that hasnt been extensively tested on human subjects. This much I know after 30 years in the pharmaceutical industry.”
“No candidate vaccine has been in development for more than a few months. If any such vaccine is approved for use under any circumstances that are not EXPLICITLY experimental, I believe that recipients are being misled to a criminal extent.”